Milestone in EU Customs Reform: Member States Adopt a Common Position on the New Union Customs Code (UCC)

On 27 June 2025, EU finance ministers agreed a common position on the most ambitious overhaul of the Union Customs Code (UCC) in a generation. For traders, platforms, logistics companies and customs brokers, this is not just another legislative waypoint: it is the blueprint for how goods data will be collected, assessed, and cleared across the EU for the next decade. The reform pivots the customs union toward a digital-first, risk-led model built on a central EU Customs Data Hub, overseen by a new European Customs Authority (EUCA) and paired with an upgraded “Trust & Check” regime for highly compliant traders. Alongside that structural shift, the package rethinks how the EU handles the tidal wave of e-commerce parcels, proposes platform accountability, and signals a phased move away from fragmented national IT toward one shared data spine.

This article translates that reform into the practical impacts your business will feel. We explain what is changing, what the Council’s position actually says in business terms, how the timeline is likely to unfold, and—most importantly—what to do next so your customs declaration processes, systems, contracts and customer communications are ready.

The reform in one page — from parallel national systems to one data-led union

The current UCC—finalised in 2016—left the EU with dozens of national systems exchanging messages. It worked, but it was not built for 4.5+ billion small parcels a year, for sanctions that turn overnight, or for supply chains that re-route every quarter. The Council’s common position keeps national customs authorities in charge of enforcement but moves data and risk into a shared fabric:

• EU Customs Data Hub: a single, EU-level platform through which economic operators submit core goods and trader data once for use across Member States. The hub becomes the canonical source for risk analysis and pre-arrival assessments.
• European Customs Authority (EUCA): a new agency to manage that hub, coordinate high-risk targeting, and set operational standards with Member States.
• Trust & Check traders: an enhanced status—more demanding than AEO—designed for operators that provide deep supply-chain transparency and continuous data. Benefits include major simplifications, with fewer stops and faster green-lane releases.
• E-commerce accountability: obligations for platforms and vendors to provide accurate data up front and to comply with EU rules, plus scope for a small-consignment handling fee to cover inspection and risk costs on the ultra-long tail of parcels.
• Once-only, paperless trade: a push to end duplicate submissions and paper proofs, aligning with Single Window and paperless-trade initiatives so exceptions (not routines) require paper.

The logic is simple: move the work upstream, digitise the evidence, and allow authorities to target fraud and unsafe goods precisely without slowing compliant trade.

What will actually change for traders and intermediaries?

Data, not forms, becomes the product

The core currency of customs will be high-quality, reusable data, not boxes ticked on national forms. Expect stronger validation at source (master data, product identities, HS codes, valuation elements, partner identifiers) and persistent data objects that you update over time rather than re-enter on each shipment. The hub should end the “copy-paste between systems” pattern that creates errors and interventions.

A new premium lane for the most transparent operators

“Trust & Check” is more than a new badge. It asks for deeper visibility into your supply chain (e.g., component provenance, audit trails, and event data) in exchange for fewer physical and document checks, faster releases, and—over time—automation of routine authorisations. Unlike AEO—which remains valuable—Trust & Check is explicitly data-centric and continuous. Think API-driven confidence, not only paper audits.

E-commerce: platforms carry the compliance load

The reform answers the parcel tsunami by making platforms responsible for complete, correct data. That includes product classification, safety and conformity information, and—where applicable—payment or facilitation of duties and taxes. Expect standardized schemas for item-level descriptions and a move away from vague, non-descriptive entries. A small-consignment handling fee can be introduced to fund risk management and discourage abuse of under-declaration.

Single submissions, EU-wide recognition

The “once-only” principle means your core dataset travels with the goods: you won’t re-key the same actors, product identities or proofs for each border. For businesses operating in multiple Member States, this should translate into less back-and-forth and fewer “lost in translation” moments between national systems.

Timeline—what happens when (and how to plan)

The Council’s negotiating mandate opens trilogues with the European Parliament. Expect 12–18 months of institutional negotiation on the scope of EUCA’s powers, the phasing of the Data Hub, the exact design of Trust & Check, and the mechanics of the small-parcel handling fee. After political agreement, the EU will publish secondary legislation and a staggered implementation plan. A pragmatic cadence could look like this:

1. 2025–2026: Trilogues and political deal; early technical pilots for the hub and Trust & Check criteria.
2. 2026–2028: Optional onboarding to the Data Hub for selected flows and operators; e-commerce rules begin earlier (they are easiest to codify and deliver fastest consumer protection).
3. 2028 onward: Progressive expansion of hub-enabled processes, with sunset dates for duplicative national interfaces; Trust & Check benefits ramp as data quality improves.

You should plan for a multi-year transition where both the old and new channels run in parallel. That creates opportunity to test, measure, and industrialise without betting your peak season on a first release.

The operational implications—what changes in the back office and on the quay

Master data discipline becomes your de-risking lever

Classification, valuation and origin are already the top sources of interventions. In a hub world, inconsistent master data will echo loudly across every filing and Member State. The cure is methodical:

• Govern your HS catalogue with owner approvals, version control and evidence (rulings, engineering specs, supplier declarations).
• Align product and partner identities across ERP, WMS, TMS and broker platforms.
• Store transformation and origin proofs in structured, searchable form so they can be supplied once and referenced often.

From document packets to verifiable data objects

Under the future UCC, the most efficient traders will present verifiable data objects—digitally signed, time-stamped, and linkable to their source systems. Paper or PDFs won’t die overnight; they will become exceptions. Make “evidence packaging” a product feature of your customs stack, not a scramble at the back end.

Brokers evolve from data entry to risk engineering

As data entry fades, brokers will increasingly add value by designing risk-smart processes, monitoring confidence scores, and advising on Trust & Check readiness. Your selection criteria should shift accordingly: look for providers with data science capability, robust API suites, and strong audit automation—not just headcount.

E-commerce sellers: from “label and hope” to structured, item-level data

If you sell direct to EU consumers, assume the era of vague descriptions is over. Invest in structured catalogues with accurate attributes, item-level HS codes, and clear safety and conformity metadata. Platform liability means marketplaces will enforce stricter listing requirements; meet them early to keep your listings live.

Intersections that matter: Single Window, ICS2 and your UK linkages

EU customs does not operate in a vacuum. Three intersections will shape your workload:

• Single Window and paperless trade: as more administrations accept electronic certificates and licences, your benefit from clean data multiplies—especially for SPS and dual-use items.
• Security filings (ICS2) and ENS data: pre-arrival risk assessment relies on timely, accurate ENS declarations. Align your freight and e-commerce pipelines so ENS data is derived from the same source of truth as customs entries.
• UK–EU supply chains: if you stage inventory in the UK, your UK export declarations feed the EU import process in timing and content. Ensuring data parity across CDS declarations, shipping labels and EU entries cuts interventions at the EU border.

If you need a practical place to start, the CDUK digital customs platform is designed to capture validated data once and reuse it across import declarations, export declarations, CDS declarations, and ENS declarations. For teams building standard operating procedures and training, the CDUK Knowledge Base provides step-by-step guidance and checklists.

Trust & Check vs AEO—how to think about readiness

AEO (Authorised Economic Operator) remains the baseline for simplifications and mutual recognition. Trust & Check does not replace it; it layers on top with two key differences:

1. Continuous, machine-readable transparency: not just an audit every few years, but sustained access to high-quality data about your flows, bills of materials, and compliance controls.
2. Operational outcomes: fewer checks, faster releases, and greater automation in return for that transparency.

To position for Trust & Check, run a gap assessment across five axes: (i) master data quality; (ii) event capture and traceability; (iii) evidence packaging and digital signatures; (iv) governance (ownership, change control, audit trails); and (v) exception management (how you detect and remediate anomalies). If you treat those as product requirements—not compliance afterthoughts—you will be able to unlock the new lane early.

E-commerce specifics—what platforms and brands should do now

Standardise your item data. Many interventions stem from non-descriptive titles or missing attributes. Work toward a canonical product schema that includes material, function, composition, gender/age where relevant, and conformity marks.

Decide your incoterms and duty model. DDP (duties paid at checkout) with accurate landed-cost calculation improves conversion and reduces returns compared to shifting duties to the doorstep. As platforms enforce compliance, expect DDP to become the norm.

Prepare for a handling fee on small consignments. Budget for a modest per-parcel charge in your cost-to-serve. It is designed to fund risk and inspection, and to nudge abuse out of the system. Use bundling and smart promotions to protect contribution margin.

Automate returns intelligence. Returns create duplicate declarations unless you design reversible data flows. Capture identifiers (lot/serial numbers, order IDs) so the customs treatment of returns can be automated and auditable.

Frequently Asked Questions

The bigger picture—competitiveness through compliance by design

The new UCC is not about moving more forms from paper to PDF. It is about moving customs from documents to data, from periodic audits to continuous confidence, and from fragmented national systems to a shared European fabric. Companies that treat compliance as a design challenge—not a chore—will clear faster, plan with greater certainty, and unlock new simplifications as soon as they are available. Those who wait will find that error-tolerant borders are fading and that rework costs rise.

Start with the foundations you control: clean master data, verifiable evidence, and automated flows from order to filing. Connect your systems so import declarations, export declarations, CDS declarations (for UK legs), and ENS declarations draw from the same source of truth. Equip teams with the right tools and playbooks; iterate quickly. The policy wind is at your back—if your data sails are up.

We value your feedback, and if you have any comments, suggestions or anything else that you would like to highlight to us, we will be delighted to hear from you and incorporate your feedback into our content.

Note: While we have made every attempt to ensure that the information contained in this Site has been obtained from reliable sources, Customs Declarations UK is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. All information in this Site is provided “as is”, with no guarantee of completeness, accuracy, timeliness or of the results obtained from the use of this information, and without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including, but not limited to warranties of performance, merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Nothing herein shall to any extent substitute for the independent investigations and the sound technical and business judgment of the reader. In no event will Customs Declarations UK, or its partners, employees or agents, be liable to you or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information in this Site or for any consequential, special or similar damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Certain links in this Site connect to other Web Sites maintained by third parties over whom Customs Declarations UK has no control. Customs Declarations UK makes no representations as to the accuracy or any other aspect of information contained in other Web Sites.